|
STATISTICS ON THE 2004 PROMOTION EXERCISE
- INTRODUCTION
The statistics below relate to the results of the promotion exercise
carried out in 2004.
The table in Annex I shows by grade, the number of officials promoted
and the total number in the grade.
The table in Annex II
 sets out more detailed statistics, by sex,
seniority in grade, age, career profiles, etc.
- TECHNICAL COMMENTS
Population covered by the statistics
The statistics set out below cover all officials and temporary staff
under Article 2(d) of the Conditions of employment of other servants of
the European Communities whose grade in 2004 allowed them to be promoted
to the higher grade (see
General
implementing provisions of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations,
adopted by the Commission on 24 March 2004).
They relate to the population of officials and temporary staff employed
in the Commission’s departments and Offices (including OLAF) on 31
December 2003.
Calculating seniority in grade
The seniority in grade of promoted officials is calculated to the
nearest day, i.e. by calculating the time from the date of entry into
the grade to the date when the 2004 promotions took effect. This figure
is then rounded to the nearest tenth of a year.
Standard deviation
The standard deviation of the average time spent in the grade by the
officials promoted indicates the dispersion of the population by
comparison with the average: the lower the standard deviation, the
higher the proportion of promoted officials whose seniority is close to
the average.
‘Rapid’, ‘normal’ and ‘slow’ career profiles
The average time spent in the grade is that observed for officials
paid from the operational appropriations in the general budget.
- A promoted official has a ‘normal profile’ in career terms
if his/her seniority in the grade is equal to the average time spent
in the grade for 2004 plus or minus one standard deviation.
- A promoted official has a ‘rapid profile’ in career terms
if his/her seniority in the grade is less than the average time spent
in the grade for 2004 minus one standard deviation.
- A promoted official has a ‘slow profile’ in career terms if
his/her seniority in the grade is greater than the average time spent
in the grade for 2004 plus one standard deviation.
ANNEX I
Statistics on the 2004 promotion exercise
|
Cat. |
Grade |
Sex |
Number
promoted |
Total number
in grade |
Promotion rate
(promoted/total) |
|
A |
A5 |
F |
49 |
307 |
16% |
|
|
|
M |
129 |
1066 |
12% |
|
|
|
Total |
178 |
1373 |
13% |
|
|
A6 |
F |
68 |
339 |
20% |
|
|
|
M |
154 |
829 |
19% |
|
|
|
Total |
222 |
1168 |
19% |
|
|
A7 |
F |
77 |
465 |
17% |
|
|
|
M |
177 |
894 |
20% |
|
|
|
Total |
254 |
1359 |
19% |
|
|
A8 |
F |
13 |
22 |
59% |
|
|
|
M |
18 |
41 |
44% |
|
|
|
Total |
31 |
63 |
49% |
|
B |
B2 |
F |
27 |
227 |
12% |
|
|
|
M |
38 |
445 |
9% |
|
|
|
Total |
65 |
672 |
10% |
|
|
B3 |
F |
44 |
333 |
13% |
|
|
|
M |
58 |
433 |
13% |
|
|
|
Total |
102 |
766 |
13% |
|
|
B4 |
F |
49 |
387 |
13% |
|
|
|
M |
70 |
439 |
16% |
|
|
|
Total |
119 |
826 |
14% |
|
|
B5 |
F |
46 |
181 |
25% |
|
|
|
M |
59 |
186 |
32% |
|
|
|
Total |
105 |
367 |
29% |
|
C |
C2 |
F |
96 |
907 |
11% |
|
|
|
M |
15 |
217 |
7% |
|
|
|
Total |
111 |
1124 |
10% |
|
|
C3 |
F |
130 |
948 |
14% |
|
|
|
M |
31 |
237 |
13% |
|
|
|
Total |
161 |
1185 |
14% |
|
|
C4 |
F |
165 |
988 |
17% |
|
|
|
M |
42 |
208 |
20% |
|
|
|
Total |
207 |
1196 |
17% |
|
|
C5 |
F |
87 |
283 |
31% |
|
|
|
M |
21 |
83 |
25% |
|
|
|
Total |
108 |
366 |
30% |
|
D |
D2 |
F |
5 |
40 |
13% |
|
|
|
M |
20 |
130 |
15% |
|
|
|
Total |
25 |
170 |
15% |
|
|
D3 |
F |
6 |
11 |
55% |
|
|
|
M |
19 |
48 |
40% |
|
|
|
Total |
25 |
59 |
42% |
|
L |
L5 |
F |
39 |
263 |
15% |
|
|
|
M |
18 |
184 |
10% |
|
|
|
Total |
57 |
447 |
13% |
|
|
L6 |
F |
46 |
236 |
19% |
|
|
|
M |
27 |
121 |
22% |
|
|
|
Total |
73 |
357 |
20% |
|
|
L7 |
F |
38 |
188 |
20% |
|
|
|
M |
18 |
93 |
19% |
|
|
|
Total |
56 |
281 |
20% |
|
|
L8 |
F |
10 |
33 |
30% |
|
|
|
M |
8 |
15 |
53% |
|
|
|
Total |
18 |
48 |
38% |
|
