DECISION OF THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY ON THE APPLICATION OF THE ADMISSION
CRITERIA FOR THE 2006 ATTESTATION PROCEDURE
Applicants will be admitted to the attestation procedure provided
they meet each of the four criteria relating to the level of education,
seniority, potential to perform "Administrative assistant" level
functions, and the level of performance. These criteria are spelled out
in Article 5(1) of the Commission Decision of 29 November 2006 laying
down the rules for implementing the attestation procedure(1).
The appointing authority must adopt detailed rules for applying these
criteria after consulting the joint attestation committee, as laid down
in Article 4 of the above Decision.
The detailed rules for applying the admission criteria for the 2006
attestation exercise are set out in the Annex. The joint attestation
committee was consulted on 8 December 2006.
Brussels, 14 December
2006
Irene Souka
Director Staff and Careers
Directorate General for Personnel and Administration
DETAILED RULES FOR APPLYING THE ADMISSION CRITERIA
FOR THE 2006 ATTESTATION PROCEDURE
To be included in the final list of applicants admitted to the 2006
attestation procedure applicants must meet each of the four admission
criteria detailed below.
- SENIORITY IN C* OR D* CAREER STREAMS
- For the purpose of applying this criterion, seniority
acquired in category C* or D* or in a higher category as an
official or temporary staff member will be taken into account.
- Seniority as a temporary staff member will be taken into
account even if there has been a break between the periods of
work as a temporary staff member and as an official.
- Periods of work when seconded in the interests of the
service or at your own request (in another European institution,
in a Community/executive agency or in an organisation devoted to
furthering the Community's interests) will be taken into
account.
- Leave on personal grounds will not be taken into account.
- Seniority acquired as at 16 January 2007 will be taken into
account.
- LEVEL OF EDUCATION AND TAKING INTO ACCOUNT OF PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE TO SUPPLEMENT THE LEVEL OF EDUCATION
- Applicants must have a level of education at least equal to
that required by Article 5(3)(a) of the Staff Regulations for
appointment to the AST function group, i.e. "a level of
post-secondary education attested by a diploma"
(non-university higher education course or short university
course lasting at least 2 years).
- However, if you do not have this level of education, your
professional experience acquired in the institutions (even with
a status other than official or temporary staff member) or
outside the institutions may count towards your level of
education.Education levels can be supplemented as follows:
LEVEL OF EDUCATION |
Level of your highest qualification |
Minimum seniority C*/D* Additional professional
experience |
a) Primary education |
5 years
|
9 years |
b) Secondary education (not giving
access to post-secondary education) |
5 years |
c) Secondary education giving access
to post-secondary education |
2 years |
d) Post-secondary education (non-university
higher education course or short university course
lasting at least 2 years) |
0 |
e) University education lasting at
least 3 years |
f) University education lasting at
least 4 years |
g) University level education –
third stage |
- Only studies certified by a diploma - recognised by the Member
State or third country in which it was issued – will be taken
into account.
- An indicative and non-exhaustive list of diplomas by level of
education will be made available to staff.
- THE POTENTIAL
- The potential of applicants to perform "Administrative
assistant" level functions must have been positively assessed in
the 2005 evaluation exercise.
- Only Career Development Reports (CDRs) relating to 2005 and
covering at least 6 months will be taken into account for the
purpose of applying this criterion.
- THE LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
- Applicants for the 2006 attestation procedure will not be
admitted if their professional performance was assessed as
inadequate or insufficient in their annual 2005 CDR.
- In accordance with Commission Decision C(2004) 1597 of 28
April 2004 on maintaining individual professional standards,
merit points of 9.5 or less equate to insufficiency.
- Assessment as "insufficient" or "poor" in one of the three CDR
headings equates to inadequate performance.
- GENERAL PROVISIONS
5.1. Verification of the information provided in the application
form
- DG ADMIN will systematically verify the information in the
application form of each of the candidates included in the list
referred to in Article 5(4) after publication of this list and
at the latest when the requests for attestation are processed.
- If there is a discrepancy between the information in the
application form and the documents in your personal file,
admission to attestation will not be granted.
5.2. Special training module
- The content of the training module mentioned in Article 6(2)
will be indicated at the time of publication of the final list
of applicants admitted to the 2006 attestation procedure.
___________________
Footnotes
(1) Decision C(2006) 5788 of 29
November 2006 laying down the rules for implementing the attestation
procedure. |