2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE
The 2008 promotion exercise will be the sixth and final one organised
in accordance with the procedures agreed by the Commission in 2002. This
Administrative Notice recaps the key elements involved.
With regard to future promotion exercises, on 14 April 2008, the
Commission adopted in first reading the draft implementing provisions
(GIPs) for a revised appraisal and promotion system to enter into force in
2009. Final approval is expected before the end of May 2008. For further
information on this new system, see :http://www.cc.cec/pers_admin/revision_cdr_promotion/index_en.html
- CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROMOTION SYSTEM IN FORCE SINCE
2003
The current promotion system was applied for the first time in 2003. The
entire promotion exercise is managed via the Sysper 2 “promotion”
module. Officials have individual access to their promotion files by
means of a personal secret password. Promotion files contain information
on the allocation of priority points received under the exercise and on
the individual’s situation as regards accumulated priority points and
merit points.
1.1. What are the key principles of the current promotion system ?
- Officials accumulate merit points and priority points over
successive promotion exercises. The aggregate number of these points
produces an accumulated stock of points.
- In each promotion exercise, the following individuals are
promoted:
- all officials with a number of accumulated points above the
promotion threshold (1);
- officials with a number of accumulated points equal to the
promotion threshold, provided that there are sufficient budget
resources available. To this end, provision has been made for a
mechanism to choose between officials having the same ranking
(“ex-aequo” officials) on a proposal from the promotion committees.
- The aggregate number of points accumulated by promoted officials
will be reduced by the number of points corresponding to the promotion
threshold.
The principles governing this promotion system are set out in detail
in Administrative Notice No 34-2003 of 2
May 2003.
1.2. How are merit points and priority points accumulated?
Each year, officials are allocated merit points and, in certain cases,
priority points.
- Merit points are the result of the mark out of 20 given in
the annual career development review (CDR). Officials given a mark of
15 in their CDR for 2007 will be awarded 15 merit points for the 2008
promotion exercise.
However, there are a number of exceptions to this general rule, for
instance, if the official in question has had a number of appraisals
each covering part of the previous year, has changed category or has
not been in active employment for the whole of the reference period.
In these cases, merit points will be calculated in proportion to the
period served in the grade.
- There are several categories of priority points:
- Priority points allocated by the Directorate-General (PPDG):
these are awarded by the Directors-General, within the quota
available (see point 1.3.), to officials deemed most deserving, as
follows:
- officials who have demonstrated exceptional merit may be
allocated 6 to 10 priority points;
- other officials may be awarded a maximum of 4 points;
Officials whose most recent CDR contains an assessment of “poor”
or “inadequate” are not eligible for priority points.
The criteria laid down for allocating these points must be made
known to the staff of the Directorate-General concerned. They are
notified to DG ADMIN, which informs the Staff Committee.
The proposals for the award of priority points by the
Directors-General (the formal intentions) are published by DG ADMIN
(see point 3: timetable for the promotion exercise).
- Priority points in recognition of additional work carried out
in the interest of the institution (PPII): the promotion
committees may propose the award of priority points to officials who
have carried out tasks which are in the interest of the institution
and which do not form part of their normal duties. The list of the
tasks in question is contained in
Annex I
to the general provisions for implementing Article 45 (adopted
by the Commission on 23 December 2004). In 2007, the promotion
committees recommended that to be eligible for these points
officials must have carried out the eligible tasks for at least four
days. A maximum of 2 such points may be awarded per official and per
year.
DG ADMIN has asked the European Personnel Selection Office and each
Joint Committee Chair for a detailed list of the Commission
officials who have taken part in their work and the number of days
worked by each official.
The information relating to these priority points will be made known
to staff before the promotion committees meet (see point 3:
timetable for the promotion exercise). Officials will therefore
be able to lodge an appeal with the appropriate committee if they
consider that the information published does not reflect the
additional work which they undertook during 2007 in the interest of
the institution.
As announced in Administrative Notice
20-2008 of 11 April 2008, the new promotion system to be in
force in 2009 foresees the abolition of the PPII. Eligible tasks
carried out in 2008 will therefore not be rewarded with PPII in the
2009 promotion exercise.
- Priority points awarded by the promotion committees on appeal
(PPPCA): the committees may propose the allocation of priority
points on appeal to officials who have contested the number of
Directorate-General priority points accorded to them by lodging an
appeal with the committee concerned. For the appeal to succeed, the
committee must consider the appeal to be justified and must
substantiate its proposal. No limit has been set for the number of
points which may be allocated on appeal.
- Transitional priority points awarded by the Appointing
Authority (PPTAA): these will be awarded to officials whose
seniority in their grade on 1 January 2008 exceeds the average
seniority in that grade for officials promoted in 2007. The number
of these points will depend on the official’s merit mark for 2006.
It cannot exceed 4 points and must be calculated in accordance with
the table in point 2.3 of Annex II of the
general
provisions for implementing Article 45.
- Transitional priority points awarded by the promotion
committees (PPTPC): the committees are able to propose the
allocation of up to 3 priority points to offset any problems
resulting from the transition to the current promotion system
entered into force in 2003.
1.3. How is each Directorate-General’s quota of priority points
calculated?
Each Directorate-General or department has, for a given grade, a quota
of priority points equal to 2.5 times the number of officials in that
grade (as at 31 December 2007) and for whom the Directorate-General has
by 25 June 2008:
- completed the CDR(s) covering 2007;
- set validated objectives for 2008;
- drawn up a training map covering at least 2008.
The quota of priority points is reduced if, for the grade in
question, the average merit marks exceed the expected average by more
than one point. However, Directorates-General may apply for exemptions.
These applications are examined by a joint working party chaired by the
Director -General of DG ADMIN and comprising four members representing
the administration and four members designated by the Staff Committee,
representing the staff.
The average number of merit points expected for each grade, as referred
to in Article 8 of the general provisions for implementing Article 43 of
the Staff Regulations, has been set at 14.65 for the 2008 staff
appraisal and promotion exercise.
1.4. How are the promotion thresholds set?
Promotion thresholds for all except the end-of-career grades (AD12,
AST10, AST6/C, AST4/D) derive from the convergence plan which forms part
of the revised appraisal and promotion system to enter into force in
2009. For the 2008 exercises, thresholds have been held at the 2007
level for a number of grades where the threshold value, if the
convergence plan was strictly applied, would have reached a peak in 2008
and thereafter declined in value. Officials, in all except end-of-career
grades, who have accumulated a number of points equal to or exceeding
the thresholds communicated in Administrative
Notice 20-2008 of 11 April 2008 will be promoted.
As mentioned in Administrative Notice 20-2008,
the promotion thresholds remain indicative for the end-of-career grades
(AD12, AST10, AST6/C, AST4/D). They may therefore be adjusted by the
Appointing Authority on the recommendations of the promotion committees
at the end of the promotion exercise.
1.5. Who is promoted?
For all grades, except the end-of-career grades, officials with a total
number of points on or above the promotion threshold are promoted,
provided that they meet the criteria applicable under the Staff
Regulations (minimum seniority in the grade and in service; compliance
with article 45.2 where applicable). However, there is one key exception
to this rule: officials who scored less than 10 in their most recent CDR
cannot be promoted, even if they have accumulated a total number of
points above the promotion threshold.
For the end-of-career grades, officials who have accumulated a number of
points which coincides exactly with the promotion threshold may possibly
be promoted. If budget resources do not permit the promotion of all the
officials who have reached the definitive promotion threshold (“ex
aequo” officials), the promotion committee proposes, from among these
officials, those who may be promoted on the basis of subsidiary criteria
such as seniority in the grade and factors relating to equal
opportunities or the nature of duties undertaken. Officials with the
same total number of points (whatever the origin of those points) are
deemed to have the same merit.
1.6. What are the appeal procedures?
The general provisions for implementing Article 43 of the Staff
Regulations (staff appraisal) provide for appeal procedures for
officials who contest the content of their CDR, in particular the merit
mark obtained. Joint
Evaluation Committees have been specially set up covering each
Directorate-General (2).
During the actual promotion exercise, officials who contest the proposed
number of priority points from their Directorate-General or for
additional work undertaken in the interest of the institution may lodge
an appeal with the relevant promotion committee in accordance with the
following procedures:
- Once priority points have been awarded by the Directors-General,
DG ADMIN informs staff of the lists which show, grade by grade, the
officials to whom it is proposed to allocate priority points from
their Directorate-General and those who might be granted priority
points for additional work undertaken in the interest of the
institution. Officials are then invited to consult their promotion
file.
- Officials have five working days from the publication of those
lists to lodge an appeal, via Sysper 2, with the relevant promotion
committee.
- The promotion committees (3)
are responsible for:
- making proposals on the allocation of some priority points (see
point 1.2. above);
- examining any individual appeals lodged by officials;
- in certain grades selecting possible promotees from among
ex-aequo officials (see point 1.5 above).
- Any points allocated by the Appointing Authority following the
promotion committees’ work are included in the promotion file of each
official concerned. In addition, DG ADMIN publishes the lists of
officials whom the promotion committees consider to be the most
deserving of promotion (4), the
lists of officials to whom points have been awarded for additional
work undertaken in the interest of the institution, and the lists of
officials promoted.
At the end of the promotion procedure, moreover, officials may lodge a
complaint with the Appointing Authority under Article 90(2) of the
Staff Regulations to challenge:
- the fact that they have not been promoted;
- the calculation of their merit points on the basis of the marks
in the CDR concerned (any challenge involving the merit marks
themselves is to be made as part of the appraisal exercise, as
indicated above);
- the total number of priority points obtained during the
promotion exercise, regardless of the type of points concerned.
- PARTICULAR FEATURES OF THE 2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE
2.1. Ability to work in a third language
Administrative Notice 25-2008 of 14 May
2008 sets out the implementing conditions for Article 45(2) of the Staff
Regulations in 2008 and succeeding years.
To recall the basic principles:
- Article 45(2) refers only to the first promotion after recruitment
- The demonstration of the ability to work in a third language must
be carried out in one of the several ways described in
Administrative Notice 25-2008.
- Officials who are in line for a first promotion after recruitment,
in 2008 and who are thus concerned by Article 45(2), must demonstrate
the ability to work in a third language before the end of 2008.
- Officials who do not succeed in demonstrating such an ability will
not be eligible for promotion in 2008.
2.2. Transitional provisions
Article 13 of the GIPs for this promotion exercise refers to
transitional provisions which stipulate, inter alia, that when the
promotion thresholds mentioned are published, the Directorate-General
for Personnel and Administration will indicate the grades for which
thresholds have levelled off and for which the transition phase has been
completed.
In this regard, the transition phase has been completed for the
following grades: AD7, AST5, AST2/C and AST2/D. Moreover, for new grades
(AD5, AD6, AD9, AST1, AST2, AST3, AST4, AST9), transitional provisions
should not apply.
This means that for these grades there will be no allocation of
transitional points (PPTAA and PPTPC).
In addition, transitional points allocated by the promotion committees
(PPTPC) will not apply to the grades AD13, AD12, AST10, AST6/C, and
AST4/D for which no promotion possibilities were foreseen in the former
career structure.
- TIMETABLE FOR THE 2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE
– May:
- All officials will be able to access, via the 2008 promotion file
in Sysper 2, their merit points (calculated in accordance with the
methods described above) and transitional priority points awarded by
the Appointing Authority.
– June:
- Directorates-General will submit any requests for exemption in the
event that they exceed by more than one point the expected average
merit marks covering 2007.
- Directorates-General will inform their staff of the criteria for
awarding priority points.
- The joint working party will meet to examine any requests for
exemption.
– July:
- Directorates-General will submit to the Joint Evaluation
Committees their proposals for awarding priority points.
- DG ADMIN will publish the formal intentions regarding the award of
priority points, the lists of officials most deserving of promotion
and the number of days worked in relation to work carried out in the
interest of the institution.
- End of July: closing date for lodging appeals with the promotion
committees.
– September/October:
- The promotion committees will meet.
– November:
- DG ADMIN will publish the lists of those whom the promotion
committees consider most deserve promotion, the lists of those
promoted as decided by the Appointing Authority and the list of those
awarded points for additional work undertaken in the interest of the
institution.
Further information on the promotion exercise can be found at:
http://www.cc.cec/pers_admin/promotions/index_en.html.
__________________
Footnotes
(1) With the exception of certain specific
cases such as officials who are not in active employment at the Commission
when promotion decisions are taken, officials who obtained fewer than 10
merit points in the previous appraisal exercise, officials who are the
subject of disciplinary procedures, etc.
(2) When the promotion exercise is launched,
this appeal procedure has in theory been exhausted.
(3) There are three promotion committees: one
for the AD function group, one for the AST function group (without a
career restriction) and one for the AST/C and AST/D career streams. A
promotion subcommittee has also been set up for staff paid from research
appropriations in the general budget.
(4) Lists containing, for each grade, the
names of officials who are not more than five points below the promotion
threshold and the names of officials who have reached or passed that
threshold.
Author: ADMIN A.6 |