ATTESTATION PROCEDURE, 2008 EXERCISE:
Admission criteria
The attestation procedure allows officials in the assistants' function
group (AST) who are currently in the C (AST1-7) and D (AST1-5) career
streams to access the career stream with no restriction and become members
of the assistants' function group (hereinafter “function group AST”) with
prospects of promotion to grade AST11. This procedure was introduced by
Article 10(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.
Officials from the assistants' function group (AST) who apply for the
attestation procedure will be admitted provided they meet each of the four
criteria relating to seniority, level of education (taking into account the
years of professional experience to supplement the level of education),
potential to perform "Administrative assistant" level functions, and the
level of performance. These criteria are spelled out in Article 5(1) of the
Commission Decision of 29 November 2006 (IA 55-2007) laying down
the rules for implementing the attestation procedure.(1)
The detailed rules for applying the admission criteria for the 2008
attestation exercise were adopted on 25 September 2008 by the appointing
authority, as laid down in Article 4 of the above Decision. The joint
attestation committee was consulted on 19 September 2008.
Annex
ATTESTATION PROCEDURE, 2008 EXERCISE:
Detailed rules for applying the admission criteria
To be included in the final list of applicants admitted to the 2008
attestation procedure applicants must meet each of the four admission
criteria detailed below.
- Seniority in career stream C or D
- For the purpose of applying this criterion, seniority acquired in
career stream C, D or higher as an official or temporary staff member
will be taken into account.
- Seniority as a temporary staff member will be taken into account
even if there has been a break between the periods of work as a
temporary staff member and as an official.
- Periods of work when seconded in the interests of the service or at
your own request (in another European institution, in a
Community/executive agency or in an organisation devoted to furthering
the Community's interests) will be taken into account.
- Leave on personal grounds will not be taken into account.
- Only seniority acquired as at 16 January 2009 will be taken into
account.
- Level of education and taking into account of professional experience
to supplement the level of education
- Applicants must have a level of education at least equal to that
required by Article 5(3)(a)(i) of the Staff Regulations for appointment
to the function group AST, i.e. "a level of post-secondary education
attested by a diploma" (non-university higher education course or short
university course lasting at least 2 years).
- However, if a candidate does not have this level of education,
he/she may still be eligible for attestation on the basis of
professional experience acquired in the institutions (even with a status
other than official or temporary staff member) or outside the
institutions. Education levels can be supplemented as follows:
LEVEL OF
EDUCATION
Level of highest qualification |
Minimum
seniority C/D |
Additional
professional experience |
a) Primary education |
5 years |
+ 9 years |
b) Secondary education (not giving access to
post-secondary education) |
+ 5 years |
c) Secondary education (giving access to
post-secondary education) |
+ 2 years |
d) Higher education (higher non-university
education degree or short university cycle of a legal duration of at
least 2 years) |
0 |
e) University level education of a legal duration
of at least 3 years |
f) University level education of a legal duration
of at least 4 years & third stage |
g) University level education – third stage |
- Only studies certified by a qualification/diploma - recognised by
the Member State or third country in which it was issued – obtained by
the candidate will be taken into account.
- An indicative and non-exhaustive list of diplomas by level of
education will be made available to staff.
- Professional experience: potential to perform "Administrative
assistant" level functions
- Only those applicants who are positively assessed for demonstrating
potential to perform "Administrative assistant" level functions and/or
tasks will be admitted to the 2008 attestation procedure.
- In their application forms applicants must give one or more examples of
occasions between 1 September 2005 and 31 August 2008 when they believe
they demonstrated this potential.
- On the basis of this and after consulting the applicant's reporting
officer, the countersigning officer will assess whether or not the
applicant has demonstrated potential to perform "Administrative assistant"
level functions and/or tasks.
- The reporting officer and countersigning officer responsible for the
assessment will be determined according to the post held by the applicant
on the day on which he or she signs the application for attestation.
- Level of performance
- Applicants for the 2008 attestation procedure will not be admitted if
their professional performance was assessed as insufficient or inadequate
in their annual CDR covering the year 2007.
- In accordance with Commission Decision C(2004) 1597 of 28 April 2004 on
maintaining individual professional standards, merit points of 9.5 or less
equate to insufficiency.
- Assessment as "insufficient" or "poor" in one of the three CDR headings
equates to inadequate performance.
- Miscellaneous provisions
5.1. Verification of the information in the application form
- DG ADMIN will systematically check the information relating to points 1
and 2 above in the application form of each of the applicants included in
the list referred to in Article 5(4) of the Commission Decision of 29
November 2006, after publication of this list and at the latest when the
requests for attestation are processed.
- If there is a discrepancy between the information in the application
form and the documents in the applicant's personal file, attestation will
not be granted.
- Under no circumstances will it be possible at this stage to add any
information or professional experience which the applicant might have
omitted to mention.
5.2. Specific training modules recommended
- The list of specific training modules referred to in Article 6(2) of the
Commission Decision of 29 November 2006 will be communicated to applicants
when the final list of those admitted to the 2008 attestation procedure is
published.
____________________
Footnotes
(1) Decision C(2006) 5788 of 29
November 2006 laying down the rules for implementing the attestation
procedure. |