CERTIFICATION PROCEDURE, 2007 EXERCISE
DRAFT LIST OF ADMITTED APPLICANTS AND
DRAFT LIST OF PRE-SELECTED APPLICANTS
Following the call for applications for the 2007 exercise of the
certification procedure, issued by means of
Administrative Notice N° 51-2007,
880 signed applications
were registered. The officials who applied are invited to read what
follows.
IMPORTANT WARNINGS TO APPLICANTS
-
Admission and pre-selection of the
applicants are based on the information provided in their
application form. At this stage in the procedure, that
information has not been checked.
-
DG ADMIN will systematically check the
information declared by each of the candidates authorised to
follow the mandatory training programme as stated under
point 7.9 of the call for applications. If the application
information does not tally with the documents in the
personal file, the application will consequently be deemed
not eligible.
-
Candidates who contest their
non-admission/-pre-selection have the possibility to launch
an appeal. Following the analysis of the appeals, the number
of admitted candidates as well as the draft rankings might
be modified.
-
The annexed lists are therefore
PROVISIONAL and are published subject to completion of
the checks and of the appeals' analysis mentioned above.
|
- DRAFT LIST OF ADMITTED APPLICANTS
The draft list of 835
officials whose applications are considered as admitted is given in
annex 1.
The names of the officials in grades 5 upwards of the Assistants'
function group who, on the date of publication of the call for
applications, were appointed to a permanent post at the Commission
and were in active employment, on parental leave, on family leave or
seconded in the interests of the service and who applied for the
2007 certification exercise are on the draft list of admitted
applicants provided they meet each of the two following criteria:
- As at 16 January 2008, have acquired a minimum of 3 years
seniority in the ex-B/B* career path and in grade AST5 or above.
- Have the potential required to take on the functions of an
administrator positively assessed in at least one of the annual
CDRs covering the years 2004, 2005 and 2006.
- THE DRAFT LIST OF PRE-SELECTED APPLICANTS
All admitted applicants were granted points and two rankings were
established as follows.
2.1. Points according to merit
An average of the merit points in the five last annual CDRs – i.e.
the CDRs covering the years 2001-02, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 in
the ex-B/B* career path – was
calculated (without applying a pro rata).
2.2. Points according to the level of education
The admitted candidates were awarded points according to their level
of education – as demonstrated by qualifications/diplomas officially
recognised by the Member state or the third country in which they
were issued – as follows:
Highest level of education of the
candidate |
Points |
a) |
Primary education |
0 |
b) |
Secondary education (not giving access
to higher education) |
c) |
Secondary education (giving access to
higher education) |
2 |
d) |
Higher education (higher non-university
degree or short university cycle of a legal duration of at
least 2 years) |
4 |
e) |
University level education of a legal
duration of at least 3 years |
6 |
f) |
University level education of a legal
duration of at least 4 years |
8 |
g) |
University level education – third stage
|
10 |
2.3. Points according to the recent professional experience
acquired in the institutions in priority fields
Points were granted as follows to the admitted candidates who
acquired, over the last 10 years, a professional experience within
the institutions in at least two of the 17 priority fields(1):
- 2 points awarded for every full year of professional
experience acquired between 1 January 2002 and 31 December
2007; if the professional experience acquired does not
amount to a full year, 2 twelfths of a point was awarded for
every full month.
- 1,25 point awarded for every full year of professional
experience acquired between 1 January 1998 and 31 December
2001; if the professional experience acquired does not
amount to a full year, 1,25/12ths of a point was awarded for
every full month.
2.4. Two scores for each admitted candidate
Each candidate admitted to the 2007 certification exercise was
awarded two scores on the basis of the points defined above and of
the following weighting:
SCORE 1 |
Combining the points granted for merit
(with a weighting of 60%) and the points granted for the
recent professional experience in the priority fields (with
a weighting of 40%) |
SCORE 2 |
Combining the points granted for merit
(with a weighting of 60%) and the points granted for the
level of education demonstrated by an officially recognised
qualification/diploma (with a weighting of 40%) |
2.5. Two lists established
Two provisional ranking were established as follows:
LIST 1 |
Ranking of the admitted candidates
according to scores 1 (combining points granted for merit
and for recent professional experience in the priority
fields) |
LIST 2 |
Ranking of the admitted candidates
according to scores 2 (combining the points granted for
merit and for the level of education demonstrated by an
officially recognised qualification/diploma) |
2.6. Number and list of provisionally pre-selected candidates
In view of pre-selecting a minimum of 220 candidates – i.e. twice
the number of officials who shall be authorised to follow the
training programme as a result of the 2007 certification exercise –,
the 220 best-ranked
admitted candidates are listed on the draft list of
pre-selected candidates. This unique list is published in
annex 2
.
The provisionally pre-selected candidates are the highest-ranked
admitted candidates on the two lists as follows:
- the candidates with a ranking better or equal to the
120th position on
list 1; and
- the candidates with a ranking better or equal to the 85th position on
list 2.
- APPEAL PROCEDURE
The applicants can check how their application was processed and the
results in terms of admission and ranking. The number of points
obtained and their ranking in the two lists are available in their
“certification” file in Sysper2.
The non-admitted candidates who consider they meet the admission
criteria and the candidates who contest the number of points
obtained and their ranking may lodge a substantiated appeal before
the Joint committee for the certification procedure within 10
working days following the publication of this Administrative
Notice.
This appeal has to be lodged via their « certification » file in
Sysper2, by clicking on the “Launch an appeal” button. The appeal
has to be substantiated: a free-text area of unlimited size will be
available; documents supporting the appeal have to be enclosed (via
the “Annexes” tab).
If, for some reason, an official is prevented from accessing
Sysper2, he/she may lodge an appeal by sending a substantiated note
to:
European Commission
Unit ADMIN A/6 « Certification procedure appeals »
MO 34 5/15
B-1049 Brussels
The note must be sent within 10 working days, as evidenced by the
postmark.
- NEXT STAGES IN THE PROCEDURE
After examination of the appeals by the Joint committee, the
appointing authority shall publish the final list of admitted
candidates and the final list of pre-selected candidates.
The DG and services of the pre-selected candidates (according to the
assignment on the date of signature of their application) shall
provide a motivated opinion on the basis of a comparative analysis
of the pre-selected applications. This analysis by the DGs and
services shall be based on the needs of the services and in
particular on the 3 criteria defined by the general implementation
provisions adopted on 20/11/07(2) :
- responsibilities and duties currently performed by the
pre-selected applicants as mentioned in their job description or
other relevant documents, and how these responsibilities and duties
are carried out by the applicants;
- versatility of the pre-selected candidates on the basis of the
various functions performed and responsibilities held within the
European Institutions;
- relevant training courses followed as mentioned in their training
passport; ability to work in Community languages as required by the
service; ability to follow a training programme in French or English
(given that the candidates may not follow the training referred to
in Article 7 in their principal language).
Common evaluation grids and guidelines for allocating the points and
establishing the ranking, were established by the appointing
authority after consulting the Joint committee for the certification
procedure. They are available for consultation by the candidates on
the PersAdmin website dedicated to the
certification procedure.
On the basis of the points allocated by the DGs and services, DG
ADMIN shall establish a ranking and publish the draft list of the
110 best-ranked pre-selected candidates. The pre-selected candidate
will then have the possibility to lodge a substantiated appeal
before the Joint committee for the certification procedure.
- THE COMPULSORY "CERTIFICATION" TRAINING PROGRAMME
Courses and exams will take place in English and French. A
sufficient level of linguistic knowledge is essential and no
official will be allowed to follow the programme in his/her
principal language.
The training programme should start at the end of May 2008 as
follows:
- Block 1: from Tuesday 27 May to Friday 20 June 2008 (every day
except on Wednesdays 4, 11 and 18 June);
- Block 2: from Monday 29 September to Friday 17 October (every day
except on Wednesdays 1, 8 and 15 October);
- Individual study period between the 2 blocks.
EAS shall organise information sessions for the candidates
authorised to follow the training. These sessions shall take place
in Brussels and Luxembourg early May 2008.
You will find more information on the calendar and on the content of
the training on the
EAS web site.
- CONTACT DETAILS
If you have any queries, you can contact ADMIN/A.6 Tel.: 93640 or 93936 E-mail: ADMIN PROCEDURE DE CERTIFICATION
PersAdmin web site / Certification
Annexes:
1/ Draft list of the 835 applicants admitted to the 2007
certification exercise
2/
Draft list of the 220 pre-selected applicants
_____________
Footnotes
(1) The Commission has identified particular
needs in the following 17 fields: Planning, quality management and
evaluation; Policies; Legal; Inter-institutional relations; External
relations; Information, communication and publications; Budget, finance
and contracts; Programmes, projects, actions and funds; Compliance and
infringement handling; Statistics; Control and inspection; Audit;
Analysis and advice; Scientific research; Human resources management;
Linguistics; Information technology.
(2) Decision C(2007)
5694 of 20 November 2007
laying down the general provisions for implementing Article 45a of the
Staff Regulations. |